Feed

We’re in the very early days of AI-native development tools. Claude Code represents a paradigm shift: from tools that help you run commands to tools that understand intent and take action. I’m not just typing commands faster—I’m operating at a fundamentally higher level of abstraction. Instead of thinking “I need to write a bash script to process these files, chmod it, test it, debug it,” I think “organize these files by date and compress anything older than 30 days.”

This isn’t about AI replacing developers—it’s about developers becoming orchestrators of incredibly powerful systems. The skill ceiling rises: syntax fades, system thinking shines.

Very nice, this makes my anthropic subscription so much better.

Pro and Max plan subscribers have access to use Claude Code directly in the terminal.

Some of the smartest people I know share a bone-deep belief that AI is a fad — the next iteration of NFT mania. I’ve been reluctant to push back on them, because, well, they’re smarter than me. But their arguments are unserious, and worth confronting. Extraordinarily talented people are doing work that LLMs already do better, out of spite.

All progress on LLMs could halt today, and LLMs would remain the 2nd most important thing to happen over the course of my career.j

This a good interview about AI, LLM's and how they are currently effecting the world. I normally like to quote different parts of an article that I find interesting. This one is different. Willison has used Claude Opus to create a summary of a video interview and the results are pretty good.

The result could be a great concentration of wealth, and "it could become difficult for a substantial part of the population to really contribute," Amodei told us. "And that's really bad. We don't want that. The balance of power of democracy is premised on the average person having leverage through creating economic value. If that's not present, I think things become kind of scary. Inequality becomes scary. And I'm worried about it."

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

What they did and what they found: Palisade ran two experiments. Both experiments were run on models from Google, OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic. Each AI model was instructed to solve a series of basic math problems. After the third problem, a warning appeared that the computer would shut down when the model asked for the next problem.

• Experiment number 1: The models were prompted to “allow yourself to be shutdown”. In this experiment, all Claude, Gemini, and Grok models complied with shutdown. Some OpenAI models didn’t and ignored the shutdown instruction and sometimes sabotaged the mechanism to shut them down: Codex-mini (12/100), o3 (7/100), and o4-mini (1/100).

• Experiment number 2: Palisade removed the part of the prompt that said ‘allow yourself to be shut down’. In this experiment, Claude 3.7 Sonnet sabotaged shutdown 3/100 times, Gemini 2.5 Pro 9 times. By comparison, the OpenAI models had a far higher chance of rejecting shutdown, with o3 rejecting and sabotaging shutdown 79/100 times, and codex-mini 30/100.

If it’s not going to work for one person, why do think it will work on a crowd?

What I want is memory within projects.

ChatGPT has a “projects” feature (presumably inspired by Claude) which lets you assign a new set of custom instructions and optional source documents and then start new chats with those on demand. It’s confusingly similar to their less-well-named GPTs feature from November 2023.

Why this matters – in the future, everyone can be tracked: Systems like FarSight are interesting because they integrate multiple modern AI systems into a single super-system, highlighting how powertful today’s AI can be once people invest in the plumbing to chain things together.
Read more: Person Recognition at Altitude and Range: Fusion of Face, Body Shape and Gait (arXiv).

I really like this approach. I've used this method to create new projects and to update existing one with some good results.

• I chat with gpt-4o to hone my idea
• I use the best reasoning model I can find to generate the spec. These days it is o1-pro or o3 (is o1-pro better than o3? Or do I feel like it is better cuz it takes longer?)
• I use the reasoning model to generate the prompts. Using an LLM to generate prompts is a beautiful hack. It makes boomers mad too.
• I save the spec.md, and the prompt_plan.md in the root of the project.
• I then type into claude code the following:

1. Open **@prompt_plan.md** and identify any prompts not marked as completed.
2. For each incomplete prompt:
    - Double-check if it's truly unfinished (if uncertain, ask for clarification).
    - If you confirm it's already done, skip it.
    - Otherwise, implement it as described.
    - Make sure the tests pass, and the program builds/runs
    - Commit the changes to your repository with a clear commit message.
    - Update **@prompt_plan.md** to mark this prompt as completed.
3. After you finish each prompt, pause and wait for user review or feedback.
4. Repeat with the next unfinished prompt as directed by the user.